top of page

Security Doesn’t Break Under Attack—It Breaks Under Audit

  • Writer: Martin Snyder
    Martin Snyder
  • Jun 6
  • 2 min read

When most people think of cybersecurity, they picture attacks: ransomware incidents, phishing emails, zero-day exploits. The drama. The breach. The fallout. But if you ask a seasoned security team what really keeps them up at night, the answer is almost always the same:

Audits.



Breaches have playbooks. There are war rooms, incident response frameworks, and predefined roles and actions. The chaos is managed through structure. But audits? Audits are a different beast.

Audits shine a light on all the unglamorous, quiet failures of security hygiene. Not the kind that hit headlines, but the kind that hit compliance checklists. You know the ones:

“Can you prove this system isn’t in scope?”
“Do you have screenshots from last year?”
“Where’s the evidence that this was reviewed quarterly… in Q3 of 2021?”

And that’s when the Slack messages start flying:

  • “Does anyone know what this tool is?”

  • “Who owns this?”

  • “Why does our MDM say we have 9656 laptops when we only have 4254 employees??”

This isn’t about cyberattacks. It’s about visibility.


Security isn’t hard because threats are so advanced — it’s hard because modern IT environments are sprawling, decentralized, and full of things nobody remembers setting up. SaaS apps spun up with a credit card. Shadow IT. Zombie systems that haven't been touched in years but are still quietly storing sensitive data.

We didn’t lose the data.We lost the story behind the data — who created it, who owns it, who reviewed it, who offboarded it (or didn’t).

Audits expose those gaps in ownership, documentation, and process. That’s why compliance fatigue is so real in security teams. They’re not failing at defense — they’re drowning in disjointed systems, inconsistent inventory, and forgotten context.

Want to fix it?


Start with this question:

What’s actually in your environment — and who’s touching it?

That means investing in:

  • Asset intelligence platforms like Axonius or JupiterOne that unify visibility across infrastructure, cloud, and SaaS.

  • Tools like Waldo Security (yes, that’s us) that surface unknown SaaS and unmanaged accounts before they become audit-time nightmares.

  • Process discipline that treats documentation like incident response — with rigor, reviews, and real ownership.


Because the next time someone says “we don’t use that,” they’re probably wrong.And if you can’t prove them wrong or right, you’re already in trouble.

Security isn't just about preventing the breach. It's about being able to tell the story — clearly, consistently, and with evidence.

That’s what audits test. And that’s what real security maturity looks like.

 
 
 

コメント


bottom of page