SaaS Governance for CISOs: Stop Chasing Tools, Govern Usage
- Martin Snyder
- 23 hours ago
- 4 min read

Board brief (1-pager): Identities and apps are multiplying faster than your catalog. Don’t buy another point tool—govern how SaaS is used. Waldo Security gives you the ground truth first: we discover every SaaS app, tenant, account, and OAuth grant in minutes, flag SSO/MFA bypasses, and export audit-ready evidence. Start with Instant SaaS Discovery and keep proof flowing via the SaaS Compliance Overview.
Why “more tools” isn’t fixing it (3 facts your board will accept)
Credential abuse is still the easiest path in. In the latest Verizon DBIR, ~88% of Basic Web App attacks involved stolen credentials—so anything outside enforced SSO/MFA remains low-hanging fruit. (Verizon)
Governance begins at the SaaS layer. CISA’s Cloud Security Technical Reference Architecture puts the sequence plainly: inventory → least privilege → logging for cloud/SaaS. If you skip inventory, your telemetry and controls are partial. (CISA)
Speed lowers breach cost. IBM’s 2025 study pegs average breach cost around $4.44M, with reductions tied to faster identification/containment—i.e., continuous evidence instead of scramble-and-screenshots. (IBM)
The CISO’s move: Govern usage in five decisions
1) SSO: from “supported” to enforced
Measure SSO coverage, not configuration. Alert on password logins to apps in your catalog; close guest/personal fallbacks. (This maps directly to DBIR’s credential reality.) (Verizon)
2) Consent: least privilege at the app plane
Set Microsoft Entra to “users can consent only to verified publishers and selected permissions,” route high-privilege or tenant-wide scopes for admin approval, and review/revoke grants with offline_access. (Microsoft Learn)
3) Discovery: multi-signal or it isn’t real
Correlate IdP sign-ins + collaboration/email logs + DNS/proxy + expense data to reveal duplicate tenants, personal accounts, and OAuth clients your catalog missed. This is the TRA’s “visibility first.” (CISA)
4) AI: treat it as egress, not a novelty
Netskope shows enterprise genAI use is widespread and rising; govern with allowlists and identity binding rather than whack-a-mole blocks. (Netskope)
5) Evidence: make compliance continuous
Stream SaaS audit logs to your SIEM; ship a monthly packet: SSO/MFA coverage, admin changes, OAuth diffs, offboarding timestamps, and sharing exceptions. (This is how you reduce dwell time and cycle time for audits.) (CISA)
What to stop doing (and what to do instead)
Stop doing this | Do this instead |
Treat “supports SSO” as secure | Prove enforcement and alert on password paths to cataloged apps. (Verizon) |
Let users consent to anything | Limit user consent to verified publishers + low-impact permissions; admin-approve write/tenant-wide scopes. (Microsoft Learn) |
Catalog via spreadsheets | Build a living inventory from IdP + network + suite logs (TRA). (CISA) |
Block all genAI by default | Allowlist with identity binding; monitor prompts/domains; educate with in-line coaching. (Netskope) |
Screenshot marathons at audit time | Automate exports of evidence aligned to SOC 2/ISO; correlate to SIEM detections. (IBM) |
Detection recipes you can paste into your SIEM/warehouse
Apps with traffic but no IdP trail
Proxy/DNS ⟂ IdP → WHERE domain IN known_saas AND NOT EXISTS(idp_signin[domain])Outcome: unknown services (trials, personal tenants) → owner + SSO plan. (TRA “visibility first.”) (CISA)
Password logins to SSO apps
IdP → WHERE app IN sso_catalog AND auth_method='password'Outcome: unmanaged identities in “managed” apps → enforce SSO/MFA. (DBIR.) (Verizon)
Persistent & privileged OAuth grants
OAuth exports → WHERE scopes ILIKE '%offline_access%' AND scopes ~ '(ReadWrite|mail.send|files.*write)'Outcome: revoke or down-scope; require verified publisher/admin approval going forward. (Entra docs.) (Microsoft Learn)
GenAI not tied to enterprise identity
Proxy ⟂ IdP → WHERE domain IN genai_list AND NOT EXISTS(idp_signin[user])Outcome: bind usage to enterprise identities; allowlist legit apps. (Netskope.) (Netskope)
30–60–90: a governance plan you can brief in 5 minutes
Days 1–30 – See
Run multi-signal discovery; publish the SaaS inventory (apps, tenants, accounts, OAuth grants) with owners, SSO/MFA, scopes, sensitivity. (TRA aligned.) (CISA)
Days 31–60 – Enforce
Turn SSO/MFA from “supported” to enforced on high-impact apps; set Entra user-consent policy (verified publishers, selected permissions); bulk-revoke idle offline_access. (Microsoft Learn)
Days 61–90 – Prove
Stream SaaS logs, enable drift alerts (new apps, admins, public links, high-privilege grants), and ship your first monthly evidence pack. Tie improvements to reduced time-to-detect (IBM cost driver). (IBM)
The CISO dashboard (5 KPIs that matter)
Unknown → Known: % of SaaS usage tied to inventoried apps/tenants (target +10 pts in 90 days).
SSO coverage: % of high-risk apps enforcing SSO/MFA.
OAuth health: # of high-privilege grants with offline_access (trend ↓). (Microsoft Learn)
GenAI governance: % of genAI usage mapped to enterprise identities (Netskope trend). (Netskope)
Evidence freshness: % of artifacts updated in the last 30 days.
Bottom line: Governance is not about chasing the next tool; it’s about governing usage—enforcing identity at the SaaS layer, constraining consent, and proving control operation continuously. If you want the fastest route to that maturity, start with your real map: Instant SaaS Discovery and keep auditors, customers, and insurers satisfied with SaaS Compliance Overview.
Comments