Best Privileged Access Management (PAM) Solutions in 2026
- Martin Snyder

- May 13
- 4 min read
Privileged Access Management was designed in an era when "privileged" meant a small, named set of human administrators with credentials to a small, named set of systems. Vault those credentials, broker the sessions, record everything, elevate just-in-time, rotate the secrets. The category did exactly what it was built to do, and it did it well for two decades.
That era is over. In 2026, the most dangerous privileged identity in your environment is unlikely to be a human admin. It's an OAuth token bound to an AI assistant with admin-level scopes to your inbox, your Drive, and your CRM — and your PAM platform has never seen it.
What modern PAM actually covers
The PAM category has evolved a long way past credential vaulting. A mature 2026 program includes:
Credential vaulting and rotation for shared, root, and service accounts.
Session brokering and recording so privileged actions are observable and replayable.
Just-in-time elevation instead of standing admin rights.
Secrets management for application secrets, API keys, and certificates.
Non-human identity (NHI) and machine identity governance for service accounts, workload identities, and CI/CD pipelines.
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) for over-permissioned cloud roles in AWS, Azure, and GCP.
These capabilities are valuable, and the leading PAM vendors deliver them well — CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Delinea, and HashiCorp Vault remain the most-deployed names, with Teleport and StrongDM increasingly common in cloud-native infrastructure environments. The problem isn't the controls. It's the inventory of privileged identities those controls are pointed at.
The privileged identities your PAM tool has never met
PAM operates on a known list. You onboard accounts. You vault credentials. You broker sessions. The accounts that get this protection are the ones your team explicitly identified as privileged and brought into the platform. Everything else holds privileged access without supervision.
That "everything else" category has grown faster than any PAM team can onboard. A few examples that are absolutely real in 2026 environments:
Shadow cloud tenants. Developers spin up AWS, Azure, or GCP accounts on personal cards or trial credits. Those tenants have root identities that never appear in your CIEM tool.
OAuth grants with admin scopes. A SaaS-to-SaaS integration consented to by a department head can include scopes like mail.send, files.write, or admin.directory.readonly. The token persists, often with refresh capability, often after the granting user leaves.
Service accounts in shadow SaaS. Marketing automation, billing platforms, and AI tools commonly provision service accounts that hold privileged scopes on production data. They are rarely vaulted.
AI agents. Many AI assistants now operate as autonomous agents — reading mail, writing to Drive, taking actions in CRMs, drafting code. Functionally, they are privileged service accounts. Operationally, almost none of them are in PAM.
This isn't a hypothetical inventory. It's what every SaaS breach looks like on closer inspection — privileged identities that nobody knew were privileged, holding access nobody knew was active.
Shadow AI makes the privilege problem worse, fast
The defining shift in privileged access in 2025–2026 is that privilege now scales like software. Spinning up an AI agent with broad OAuth scopes takes one consent screen. Connecting an AI feature to your existing SaaS app — and giving it the access of that app's service account — takes a single toggle in admin settings. In neither case does the workflow pass through your PAM platform.
AI features added quietly inside SaaS products you already license make this more dangerous, not less. A document collaboration tool turns on an AI summarization feature; suddenly every document in every workspace is processed by a model. A meeting platform turns on AI notetaking; suddenly transcripts are stored and possibly used for training. None of these new processing flows require a credential your PAM team would recognize. The privilege is inherited from the platform's existing service account.
The MITRE ATT&CK knowledge base has been steadily expanding its coverage of cloud and SaaS techniques that explicitly target this class of inheritance — OAuth abuse, application access token theft, and modification of trust permissions. NIST SP 800-207 is unambiguous that Zero Trust requires explicit enumeration of subjects — including non-human ones — before access decisions can be trusted. And the IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report continues to find that breaches involving lost or stolen credentials are among the costliest and slowest to detect — with the global average breach cost pushing past $4.8 million.
If your PAM program is sized for "a few dozen named admins," it is sized for the wrong decade.
The same flaw, at the worst possible layer
The pattern that breaks IAM and IGA breaks PAM more severely, because PAM is the layer where the consequences are the most concentrated. A missed entitlement in IGA is a paperwork problem. A missed privileged identity in PAM is the path to your data.
The same shadow cloud accounts that don't appear in your CIEM dashboard also don't appear in any compliance report. The same OAuth tokens that bypass your IdP also bypass your session recording. The same AI integrations that lack a vendor review also lack credential rotation. Shadow CSP — unauthorized AWS, Azure, and GCP tenants spun up outside governance — is the canonical example: privileged infrastructure that exists, holds data, and is invisible to every tool you bought to govern it.
Discovery is what makes PAM work in 2026
Every leading PAM platform in 2026 will protect what's in the vault. None of them will tell you what should be. That's a category gap, not a product gap — and it's the gap Waldo Security closes.
Waldo continuously discovers every SaaS app, cloud tenant, OAuth grant, AI integration, and unmanaged identity tied to your domain — including shadow cloud subscriptions, service accounts living in apps your IT team never approved, and AI agents holding live OAuth scopes to your data. That output becomes the missing input for your PAM, CIEM, and NHI programs: a real, current map of every identity that should be considered privileged, not just the ones already in the vault. The Cloud Governance view is purpose-built for the shadow CSP problem specifically.
The best PAM solution in 2026 is still the platform you already own. The piece that's been missing is the inventory it deserves to run on.
Want to see the privileged identities your PAM platform has never met — including the AI agents currently holding live admin scopes? Book a free demo.

Comments